Post by stevedtrm on Apr 14, 2016 1:48:06 GMT
I saw one of the admins here say that going through (by which i interpret to mean "reading") someone's personal posts was a form of online abuse.
It seems to me that while rule 4 is a form of anti spam measure, which is necessary even under momentumunofficial rules, elements 1, 2 and 3 are unnecessarily censorious or vague. Especially element 2. So vague it is utterly subjective to the administrator ruling upon it.
"Description
We are a group for Labour members & supporters (or those interested in being).
The following is forbidden:
1. Personal abuse/cyber bullying
2. Posting matters that are contrary to Labour Party opinion (given her widest ambit)
3. Posting matters seeking to re-run the Labour leadership election
4. Posting adverts/porn
Please share widely and invite other Labour party members and supporters.
PLEASE refrain from trolling, abusive messages, personal insults."
Steven.
It seems to me that while rule 4 is a form of anti spam measure, which is necessary even under momentumunofficial rules, elements 1, 2 and 3 are unnecessarily censorious or vague. Especially element 2. So vague it is utterly subjective to the administrator ruling upon it.
"Description
We are a group for Labour members & supporters (or those interested in being).
The following is forbidden:
1. Personal abuse/cyber bullying
2. Posting matters that are contrary to Labour Party opinion (given her widest ambit)
3. Posting matters seeking to re-run the Labour leadership election
4. Posting adverts/porn
Please share widely and invite other Labour party members and supporters.
PLEASE refrain from trolling, abusive messages, personal insults."
Steven.