Post by anony001 on Jan 29, 2017 9:10:29 GMT
Joan Ryan fabricates a false antisemitism accusation against a labour party pro palestinian right activist
Parliamentary LFI officer "work very closely behind the scenes"
"To call on the only Jewish nation on earth for a boycott is antisemitic."
In short, the chair of JLM actively beleives in conflating being against Israel with antisemitism.
There are plenty of Jews who vigourously oppose Israel. This labels them antisemitic.
It cant be justified but we need to understand why its happening. Joan Ryan has been captured on camera in a situation where she is quite comfortable with chatting about millions in funds supplied through an Israeli embassy through an Israeli spy during Labour conference and then fabricating false claims of antisemitism against people who oppose Israel shortly afterwards. This makes Joan Ryan a pro Israel activist in the British Parliament.
Against LFI
Training event said zionism shouldnt even be mentioned in discussions on antisemitism, thus going beyond condemning antisemitic discussions of zionism, but to censoring and stifling debate altogether.
Original name was Paole Zion
Zionism is a Jewish nationalist movement with Jewish Supremacist strands, which have no room for ethnic arabs and have supported the murder and oppression of ethnic arabs
Zionism
was appointed, according to the chair because of her activism against BDS, a palestinian human rights network, NOT against antisemitism.
Is a thug. Said she could "take jackie walker as shes tiny, only about 5'2'' tall"
In the week where her previous job at the Israeli embassy was publically exposed, accused the people who uncovered it as "Theyre all antisemites".
director
Chair is on the record as making preposterous antisemitism claims
Jeremy Newmark
Advocates who bullied Jeremy Corbyn into a confusing and vague definition of antisemitism that does not specify at all, what antisemitism is.
"A certain perception" - which of the very many resentful perceptions of Judaism is antisemitism is it? "Jews as a religion are dangerous"? "Jews as a race are dangerous". The definition doesnt tell you. It just tells you that ONE ("a" certain specific) is the perception. Idetnifying which one is impossible. And that means this is not a definition at all.
A definition is supposed to define the edges of what is antisemitism and what is not.
Its harmful because it sows confusion.
definition
Trope is a word that is used to sow confusion.
Please raise your hand if you can tell me what a "trope" is without rexaching for google or a dictionary.
primary activists behind the promotion of absurd rule changes designed to grow the definition of antisemitism such that any attempt to challenge even a Jewish allegation of antisemitism as a hate crimeis invalid.
The definition, because it is so muddy comes with lots of examples which "depending on context" show elements of antisemitism. That they depend on context and that context is not discussed or demonstrated where reasonable criticism ends and begins, means they simply further muddy the water.
But more importantly, they include examples where claiming a jewish person is more loyal to israel is antisemitic. This is in a context where we have Labour members of parliament that would generate a reasonable suspicion that they are acting to advance Isaeli interest in a way that victimises the members of their own party who have been demonstrated to be acting in ways apparently loyal to israeli interests including fabricating. What if Joan Ryan had been Jewish? We wouldnt be able to call out her Israeli apologism for what it is without being ourselves labelled antisemitic. How many proven examples of false antisemitic claims made by Jews have been prevented from being included in what i am saying today for falling foul of the new so called "definition" endorsed by LFI Theresa May, and then, sadly, under the same kind of pressure, i beleive, that led him to address LFI, even by Jeremy Corbyn.
The JLMs primary mode of operation is the stifling of leglitimate debate by attempting to muddy the waters to a point where only they can authorise a condemnation of someone as antisemitism and once made, this condemnation cant be challenged without the challenger themselves being declared antisemitic.
The JLM therefore, is a systematic terror apologist for apartheid Israeli oppression and the sheer horror and human misery Israel generates.
The primary mode of operation of JLM is to promote false accusations of antisemitism and conflating criticism of Israeli terror and other racist horrors with being antisemitic.
rules
Against JLM
Parliamentary LFI officer "work very closely behind the scenes"
"To call on the only Jewish nation on earth for a boycott is antisemitic."
In short, the chair of JLM actively beleives in conflating being against Israel with antisemitism.
There are plenty of Jews who vigourously oppose Israel. This labels them antisemitic.
It cant be justified but we need to understand why its happening. Joan Ryan has been captured on camera in a situation where she is quite comfortable with chatting about millions in funds supplied through an Israeli embassy through an Israeli spy during Labour conference and then fabricating false claims of antisemitism against people who oppose Israel shortly afterwards. This makes Joan Ryan a pro Israel activist in the British Parliament.
Against LFI
Training event said zionism shouldnt even be mentioned in discussions on antisemitism, thus going beyond condemning antisemitic discussions of zionism, but to censoring and stifling debate altogether.
Original name was Paole Zion
Zionism is a Jewish nationalist movement with Jewish Supremacist strands, which have no room for ethnic arabs and have supported the murder and oppression of ethnic arabs
Zionism
was appointed, according to the chair because of her activism against BDS, a palestinian human rights network, NOT against antisemitism.
Is a thug. Said she could "take jackie walker as shes tiny, only about 5'2'' tall"
In the week where her previous job at the Israeli embassy was publically exposed, accused the people who uncovered it as "Theyre all antisemites".
director
Chair is on the record as making preposterous antisemitism claims
Jeremy Newmark
Advocates who bullied Jeremy Corbyn into a confusing and vague definition of antisemitism that does not specify at all, what antisemitism is.
"A certain perception" - which of the very many resentful perceptions of Judaism is antisemitism is it? "Jews as a religion are dangerous"? "Jews as a race are dangerous". The definition doesnt tell you. It just tells you that ONE ("a" certain specific) is the perception. Idetnifying which one is impossible. And that means this is not a definition at all.
A definition is supposed to define the edges of what is antisemitism and what is not.
Its harmful because it sows confusion.
definition
Trope is a word that is used to sow confusion.
Please raise your hand if you can tell me what a "trope" is without rexaching for google or a dictionary.
primary activists behind the promotion of absurd rule changes designed to grow the definition of antisemitism such that any attempt to challenge even a Jewish allegation of antisemitism as a hate crimeis invalid.
The definition, because it is so muddy comes with lots of examples which "depending on context" show elements of antisemitism. That they depend on context and that context is not discussed or demonstrated where reasonable criticism ends and begins, means they simply further muddy the water.
But more importantly, they include examples where claiming a jewish person is more loyal to israel is antisemitic. This is in a context where we have Labour members of parliament that would generate a reasonable suspicion that they are acting to advance Isaeli interest in a way that victimises the members of their own party who have been demonstrated to be acting in ways apparently loyal to israeli interests including fabricating. What if Joan Ryan had been Jewish? We wouldnt be able to call out her Israeli apologism for what it is without being ourselves labelled antisemitic. How many proven examples of false antisemitic claims made by Jews have been prevented from being included in what i am saying today for falling foul of the new so called "definition" endorsed by LFI Theresa May, and then, sadly, under the same kind of pressure, i beleive, that led him to address LFI, even by Jeremy Corbyn.
The JLMs primary mode of operation is the stifling of leglitimate debate by attempting to muddy the waters to a point where only they can authorise a condemnation of someone as antisemitism and once made, this condemnation cant be challenged without the challenger themselves being declared antisemitic.
The JLM therefore, is a systematic terror apologist for apartheid Israeli oppression and the sheer horror and human misery Israel generates.
The primary mode of operation of JLM is to promote false accusations of antisemitism and conflating criticism of Israeli terror and other racist horrors with being antisemitic.
rules
Against JLM