1) transparent and therefore accountable 2) accurate 3) prioritised and therefore stratified and focussed. 4) hopeful in that it seeks to change real world politics in any way necessary. 5) accessibile 6) anonymous until implementation
and can be
7) secure when necessary.
These are the things I am looking for from any edemocracy platform and in roughly that order. 1 and 2 already exist. 3 is where diligent work is currently required.
The diagrammatic and visual thing is not concrete yet, but people need to be able to see things easily and at a glance so they feel integrated into activity and not ignored or if ignored, ignored for a provided reason.
We can sit down with a pad a pencil and a PC and i'd show you what im thinking of. I think it should focus on prioritisation filters and mass support indication first with new motions presented next to the current most popular and most prioritised ones for a limited period of time on a home page before being moved out of the way to make way for new ones.
disputes could be recognised and identified and scalar disputes seperated out. You have my email, I beleive. And my phone. Call me. Ill be in Manchester tomorrow all afternoon, i recommend you join me.